hoće da ga potope namerno tj slučajno i da isprovociraju sukob.. hm, propaganda samo... Posle da ispadne da saudijci ratuju na istoj strani sa jevrejima i koalicija puca...
hahha Sadamova propala politika.
Ako se Ahmedinedžad nada u to teško da će proći, mož samo da dovede do novog sukoba na Bliskom istoku i dobije po nosu od Izarela i USA.
Glavna politika se vodi oko toga da Amerima treba opravdanje da uđu u još jedan rat, a Izrael je već spreman , ne dvoume se ni malo. Takođe svi Arapi i muslimani treba da zatvore oči i pognu glavu dok Iran gori. Uh, težak zadatak za judeo-anglikansku masoneriju...
Pa drže im okupirana 4 otoka več 20g 40-tak kilometara od obala i još drže PVO ,ASM sisteme kao 2-3 dežurna aviona pa zašto i ne oslobode,ne treba im bolji povod,ulaze im s flotama u luke ko u svoje,18ta flota je u KSA dok je jedna nedavno isplovila iz UAE.
Nema od rata ništa,davno je Iran prešao crtu opasnosti od napada kao i S.Korea oni su postali zalogaj koji se teško može progutati,ja sam se s ljudima u 2007g kad su 3 nosača s pratnjama bili u P.Z + Britanski brodovi kaldio da rata neče biti još je Iran imao tada samo 125 plovila svih vrsta sada je to skoro duplo+tada su imali oko 7 podmornica sada imaju za koje se zna 21.
Dopuna: 06 Feb 2012 2:13
To na slici je Alvand br.71 u Iranskoj klasifikaciji je frigata ,dok je NAHDI po njihovoj klasifikaciji razarač a ustvari je i to korveta, jedini pravi razarači su 3 palang klase(po deplasmanu),koji su usidreni u lukama več dugo.
Ne znam šta če im razarači u P.Z,tamo im to netreba uostalom kakva ti korist od deplasmana bitno je šta nosi.
Da dodam da Iranci klasifikuju brodove po količini i vrsti naoružanja,pa tako dolazi do zabune a često i novinari to bubnu,ja sam tu vjest objavio na temi OS Iran prije dva dana i rečeno je samo da je dio 18-te flote usidren,a znam 100% da alvand klasifikuju kao fregatu.
heheh mene podseća na mađarski i po malo turski... otud i duman
Uglavnim ne dopada mi što imaju tu posebnu gardu isto kao i bivši iračani. i kao garda im je neuništiva itd.. Čitava vojska treba da im je standardizovana na isti nivo i snagu.
Premećuje se da je intervju čista propaganda u cilju lažnog ohrabrivanja i uzdizanja. Nisam to očekivao u Iranu.
Eh, nekad su u Džedi bili jugoslovenski tenkovi m84 na transportnim brodovima... koliko bi se samo para namlatilo za sve republike da je bilo pameti i da je izvoz nastavljen i da je program i razvoj nastavljen. Možda bi tamo bilo i naših razarača na slikama pod trobojkom bez petokrake
Miljama smo mi daleko od svega toga mož samo da gvirkamo šta veliki rade. ccc izem ti politiku.
Citat:Nelsa , mislim da ako preimenuješ video u u "Rahim Safavi interview" ili "IRGC high commander interview" imaćeš više pregleda
Hvala djole,ovo pravim upload zbog toga da mogu ovdje postaviti video,iskreno i nije mi bitno koliko če biti pregleda na Y.T.,ove klipove večinom skinem s Perzijski kanala u formatu koji samo GOM p.(posebni kodeci se skinu sa IRINN TV) može čitati pa ih moram prvo staviti na Y.T.
US President Barack Obama has warned against the serious risks of a military campaign against the Islamic Republic and underlined diplomacy as the favored solution to the impasse over Iran’s nuclear issue.
Speaking in an interview with the NBC television network on Sunday, Obama said he did not believe Tehran had the intentions to attack the United States, dismissing Israeli Deputy Prime Minister Moshe Ya'alon’s earlier claim that Iran is developing an intercontinental ballistic missile with a range of 10,000 kilometers (6,200 miles) that could reach the US East Coast.
"Any kind of additional military activity inside the Persian Gulf is disruptive and has a big effect on us. It could have a big effect on oil prices. We've still got troops in Afghanistan, which borders Iran. And so our preferred solution here is diplomatic," Obama said.
The remarks come as Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu urged Western powers to make greater efforts to negotiate a solution to Iran’s nuclear case, warning that a military strike would result in a “disaster.”
“A military option will create a disaster in our region. So before that disaster, everybody must be serious in negotiations. We hope soon both sides will meet again, but this time there will be a complete result,” Davutoglu said during a speech at the 48 Munich Security Conference in Germany on Sunday.
“If there is strong political will and mutual confidence being established, this issue could be resolved in a few days,” he said, adding that, “The technical disputes are not so big. The problem is mutual confidence and strong political will.”
Qatar's Foreign Minister Khalid Mohamed al-Attiyah also urged the West to refrain from launching an attack on Iran, stressing that the Iranian nuclear dispute should be settled through dialogue and negotiations.
"[An attack] is not a solution; and tightening the embargo on Iran will make the scenario worse. I believe we should have dialogue," al-Attiyah said.
“I believe that with our allies and friend in the West we should open a serious dialogue with the Iranians to get out of this dilemma. This is what we feel in our region,” he added.
Despite the widely publicized claims by the US, Israel and some of their European allies that Iran's nuclear program may include a military aspect, Iran insists on its civilian nature, arguing that as a signatory to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and a member of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), it has the right to develop and acquire nuclear technology for peaceful purposes.
The IAEA has conducted numerous inspections of Iran's nuclear facilities but has never found any evidence indicating that Tehran's civilian nuclear program has diverted towards nuclear weapons production.
This is while the Israeli regime is widely known to possess between 200 and 400 nuclear warheads. Furthermore, Tel Aviv refuses to allow its nuclear facilities to come under international regulatory inspectors and rejects any international nuclear regulatory agreements.
