Poslao: 11 Jul 2016 20:35
|
offline
- powSrb
- Legendarni građanin
- Pridružio: 08 Mar 2015
- Poruke: 9449
|
Citat:China Deploys UAVs to Woody Island
Локација - http://wikimapia.org/#lang=pl&lat=16.840362&am.....14&m=b
Кинези задају муке комшијама али више овима који су дошли из далека.
Citat:In case you missed it, over the US Memorial Day weekend new satellite imagery was published showing some new developments on Woody Island, China’s important governing outpost for its claimed islands in the South China Sea. The space snapshots acquired during April by ImageSat International (ISI) show new drone deployments to the expanded island adding to the arsenal of J-11 fighters, HQ-9 surface-to-air missiles and YJ-62 anti-ship missiles.
The panchromatic imagery dated 12 April 2016 shows a single Harbin BZK-005 parked just outside the base’s aircraft hangars. This is the same drone we reported patrolling the East China Sea from China’s dedicated drone facility on Daishan Island in June 2015. The deployment in the South China Sea continues to support orders that would see the Asian giant deploy drones to monitor it’s perceived maritime territory.
Unfortunately, at this time we were unable to acquire a copy of the imagery to do an independent analysis. ISI did not break out any associated ground control equipment to suggest the UAV is operated from the airbase. However, it is believed that the drone is equipped with a satellite communications system allowing for real-time data transmission and control from extended ranges.
The BZK-005’s primary mission appears to be long-range intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance. An armed version of the drone has not surfaced on satellite imagery or in handhelds. It is thought the unarmed drone can be equipped with diverse payloads including electro-optical, infrared, synthetic aperture radar, and signals intelligence sensors.
The drone was first reported in an Aviation Industry Corporation of China (AVIC) promotional video featured at the 2006 Airshow China in Zhuhai. The Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics began developing the apparent naval drone as early as 2005 in conjunction with the Hongdu Aviation Industry Group. By late 2009, Internet photos showed the UAV on the tarmac at what has now been identified as Shahezhen.
According to analyst estimates, the UAV has a flight ceiling of 8,000 meters, a max range of 2,400 km and a maximum endurance of 40 hours. The drone made big headlines in 2013 when it flew close to the disputed Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands beyond the country’s exclusive economic zone. Japan scrambled F-15 fighters to intercept as a result.
While such UAVs won’t be sinking ships or hitting ground targets, its deployment continues to reify China’s intent to put unmanned eyes in the sky to monitor nearby territory it wants to control.
Можда је могло и а другу тему, о дроновима.
|
|
|
Registruj se da bi učestvovao u diskusiji. Registrovanim korisnicima se NE prikazuju reklame unutar poruka.
|
|
Poslao: 12 Jul 2016 14:16
|
offline
- danijell
- Legendarni građanin
- Pridružio: 30 Mar 2011
- Poruke: 2743
|
Citat:An international tribunal has ruled against Chinese claims to rights in the South China Sea, backing a case brought by the Philippines.
The Permanent Court of Arbitration said there was no evidence that China had historically exercised exclusive control over the waters or resources.
China called the ruling "ill-founded" and says it will not be bound by it.
China claims almost all of the South China Sea, including reefs and islands also claimed by others.
The tribunal in The Hague said China had violated the Philippines' sovereign rights. It also said China had caused "severe harm to the coral reef environment" by building artificial islands.
BBC
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poslao: 12 Jul 2016 17:43
|
offline
- Wisdomseeker
- Nezaboravni član
- Pridružio: 12 Feb 2007
- Poruke: 8630
|
Uh baš su im rekli, sad će Kinezi da se uplaše međunarodng suda u hagu (namerno malim slovima). Nek ih neko sad istera odatle, baš bih voleo to da vidim.
|
|
|
|
Poslao: 12 Jul 2016 17:51
|
offline
- jazbar
- Legendarni građanin
- Pridružio: 28 Dec 2009
- Poruke: 16139
- Gde živiš: Lublana
|
A što su išli na sud u Haagu? Ako neće sad uvažavati odluku suda ispašče svetski imperijalisti. Recimo SAD nikada za strateške stvari ne pita sudove večinu međunarodnih ni ne priznaje.
|
|
|
|
Poslao: 12 Jul 2016 17:58
|
offline
- Pridružio: 14 Apr 2014
- Poruke: 1439
|
Филипини покренули' Кинези још раније одбацили надлежност.
|
|
|
|
Poslao: 12 Jul 2016 18:22
|
offline
- Pridružio: 28 Dec 2012
- Poruke: 2542
|
- 19Ovo se svidja korisnicima: 4channer, WS2, Snorks, Wisdomseeker, proka89, theNedjeljko, djox, vukovi, powSrb, Cranium, djboj, ssekir75, MidnighT_AlieN, Georgius, sasa76, Levi, Wiesel092, radionica1, amir3045
Registruj se da bi pohvalio/la poruku!
za Kinu je taj sud bitan isto koliko i Osnovni sud u Vlasotincu
|
|
|
|
Poslao: 12 Jul 2016 18:45
|
offline
- proka89
- Legendarni građanin
- Pridružio: 29 Avg 2011
- Poruke: 5415
|
jazbar ::A što su išli na sud u Haagu? Ako neće sad uvažavati odluku suda ispašče svetski imperijalisti. Recimo SAD nikada za strateške stvari ne pita sudove večinu međunarodnih ni ne priznaje.
Kinezi od pocetka nisu priznali da taj sud po ovom pitanju ima nadleznost. Isto kao sto su US u slucaju tuzbe Nikaragve osamdesetih godina proslog veka odbacili nadleznost suda po tom pitanju. I sta je Nikaragva mogla da radi sa dobijenom presudom? Pa samo da se slika, kao sto sada mogu i Filipini sa ovom presudom protiv Kine. Evo ti o njihovoj jurisdikciji:
Citat:The Court can only deal with a dispute when the States concerned have recognized its jurisdiction.
http://www.icj-cij.org/jurisdiction/index.php?p1=5&p2=1
A u slucaju Kine:
Citat:On 22 January 2013, the Department of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of the Philippines presented a note verbale to the Embassy of the People's Republic of China in the Philippines, stating that the Philippines submitted a Notification and Statement of Claim in order to initiate compulsory arbitration proceedings under Article 287 and Annex VII of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea ("Convention") with respect to the dispute with China over "maritime jurisdiction" in the South China Sea. On 19 February 2013, the Chinese Government rejected and returned the Philippines' note verbale together with the attached Notification and Statement of Claim. The Chinese Government has subsequently reiterated that it will neither accept nor participate in the arbitration thus initiated by the Philippines.
Citat:This Position Paper is intended to demonstrate that the arbitral tribunal established at the request of the Philippines for the present arbitration ("Arbitral Tribunal") does not have jurisdiction over this case. It does not express any position on the substantive issues related to the subject-matter of the arbitration initiated by the Philippines. No acceptance by China is signified in this Position Paper of the views or claims advanced by the Philippines, whether or not they are referred to herein. Nor shall this Position Paper be regarded as China's acceptance of or participation in this arbitration.
http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/zxxx_662805/t1217147.shtml
Znaci jasno od pocetka stavili do znanja da po njima taj sud nema jurisdikciju u konkretnom slucaju. Sto nas dalje dovodi do zakljucka da je ceo proces cirkus, za koji se od pocetka znalo da realno nece promeniti nista na terenu, vec se radi o cisto politickom pritisku na Kinu.
Ne ulazim uopste u to ko ima pravo na taj deo mora.
|
|
|
|
Poslao: 12 Jul 2016 22:01
|
offline
- powSrb
- Legendarni građanin
- Pridružio: 08 Mar 2015
- Poruke: 9449
|
Хаг и Кина...
Још мало ће Кина имати суд који ће судити тим са запада.
Острво са претходне стране.
02.05.2012 - 04.26.2016.
|
|
|
|