|
Poslao: 23 Mar 2024 21:38
|
offline
- djox
- Legendarni građanin
- Pridružio: 23 Nov 2010
- Poruke: 99395
|
Detalji napada po Avganistanu od pre par dana
Citat:Details of PAF CT Airstrikes in Afghanistan on 18 March 2024
▪️3 trans-frontier targets were simultaneously engaged by PAF assets.
▪️Hideouts of Hafiz Gul Bahadar
group (involved in suicide attack on 16 March in Mir Ali, North Waziristan)
were selected as targets. Details of hideouts:
• Target-1: Abdullah alias Tobagar, Paktika. Compound has been
completely destroyed.
▪ Causalities: 2x terrorists killed, 5x injured.
▪ Abdullah Shah alias Tobagar was not present, remained safe.
• Target-2: Hassan Gul alias Toofan, Khost. Markaz of Commander
Hassan Gul alias Toofan in Spera, Khost was engaged.
▪ Causalities: 4x terrorists killed (including Commander Naimat
Ullah alias Zakir) & 3 injured.
• Target-3: Farman alias Akrama, Khost. Markaz of Commander Farman alias Akrama in Spera, Khost was engaged.
▪ Causalities: 3x terrorists killed & 1 injured.
▪ Collateral: Nil.
• Target-4: Moeez Khan alias Moeezgai, Paktika. Target was aborted at last moment due to possibility of high collateral.
➢ Summary:
• Casualties: 9x terrorists killed and 7-9 x injured.
➢ Note:
• Overall, as per sources 18 terrorists were killed & 9-12 injured.
• Reports regarding injury of commander Mufti Sadiq Noor alias
Talha, Deputy to Hafiz Gul Bahadar and killing of Molvi Jehadyar, Samiullah & Qari Abid have also been received.
https://twitter.com/zarrar_11PK/status/1771185482157699344
|
|
|
|
|
Registruj se da bi učestvovao u diskusiji. Registrovanim korisnicima se NE prikazuju reklame unutar poruka.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poslao: 17 Maj 2024 23:28
|
offline
- djox
- Legendarni građanin
- Pridružio: 23 Nov 2010
- Poruke: 99395
|
Opet sukob sa talibanosima...snimak je na linku
Citat:Pakistani forces targeting Afghan Taliban's Turkamanzai Camp
— There have been several clashes between the Taliban administration in Afghanistan and Pakistani border forces in recent months along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border.
https://x.com/clashreport/status/1791578692394627579
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poslao: 08 Sep 2024 20:59
|
offline
- Cufo
- Počasni građanin
- Pridružio: 21 Feb 2012
- Poruke: 895
- Gde živiš: Whitecity
|
Biće tu totalnog Haosa, taj Pakistan je neka muslimanska Jugoslavija:
Indija pametno ne zateže, pušta da Pakistan sam od sebe implodira umesto da ga homogenizuje svojom pretnjom... jedino što su navalili u Istočnom Pakistanu da ubijaju Hinduse, to bi moglo da Indiju aktivira...
Mada je Balučistan i granica sa Avganistanom ipak veća neuralgična tačka koja će morati da se sredi na ovaj ili onaj način...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poslao: 16 Sep 2024 08:51
|
offline
- djox
- Legendarni građanin
- Pridružio: 23 Nov 2010
- Poruke: 99395
|
Ameri im uveli sankcije na raketni program
Ciljaju kineske dobavljace
𝗨𝗦 𝗦𝗮𝗻𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗼𝗻 𝗣𝗮𝗸𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻’𝘀 𝗠𝗶𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗹𝗲 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗴𝗿𝗮𝗺
Citat:The United States has imposed sanctions on Chinese suppliers and a Pakistani entity for their alleged involvement in Pakistan’s ballistic missile program, a US official said on Thursday.
In a statement, the US Department of State announced sanctions against five entities and one individual, accusing them of transferring missile technology and equipment in violation of the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR).
Among those sanctioned is the Beijing Research Institute of Automation for Machine Building Industry (RIAMB), which the US says is linked to Pakistan's National Development Complex (NDC), a key player in the development of Pakistan's long-range ballistic missiles.
The sanctions also target three other China-based entities, one Chinese individual, and a Pakistani entity, all accused of supporting Pakistan's missile program.
 https://www.aa.com.tr/en/asia-pacific/us-sanctions.....am/3329571
https://x.com/Defence_IDA/status/1835498885474644451
Citat:𝗣𝗮𝗸𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻’𝘀 𝗥𝗲𝘀𝗽𝗼𝗻𝘀𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗨𝗦 𝗦𝗮𝗻𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀.
Pakistan dismissed the US move as politically motivated and biased. According to the Pakistani Foreign Ministry, these sanctions reflect double standards in global non-proliferation efforts.
Islamabad argues that countries like India, despite receiving foreign technology support, are not subjected to similar sanctions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
