|
deki99 ::Napisano: 08 Jan 2013 0:00
pikseta ::Mora da se salis ? penzionisani Egipatski general , clan muslimanskog bratstva i glavni logisticar pobunjenika u Libiji i Siriji daje " nezavisnu" procenu na " nezavisnoj" Al Dzaziri ? Sta je sledece ? General Klark daje 'nezavisnu" analizu NATO agresije 1999 ili David Petraeus "nezavisno" ocenjuje okupaciju Iraka ? U ovo ne veruju ni ljudi koji se 24/7 zrace zapadnom propagandom
Pa završio je posao u Libiji.Ima čovek iskustva.Mora mu se verovati.
Dopuna: 08 Jan 2013 0:01
deki99 ::pikseta ::Mora da se salis ? penzionisani Egipatski general , clan muslimanskog bratstva i glavni logisticar pobunjenika u Libiji i Siriji daje " nezavisnu" procenu na " nezavisnoj" Al Dzaziri ? Sta je sledece ? General Klark daje 'nezavisnu" analizu NATO agresije 1999 ili David Petraeus "nezavisno" ocenjuje okupaciju Iraka ? U ovo ne veruju ni ljudi koji se 24/7 zrace zapadnom propagandom
Pa završio je posao u Libiji.Ima čovek iskustva.Mora mu se verovati.
Svako veruje u ono što hoće i koliko je u stanju neke stvari da razume.
Dopuna: 08 Jan 2013 0:07
The Syrian rebels continued their attacks against two key airbases today. The first, the Minakh military airport (also spelled Meng, Minnigh, or Menneg). The second airbase that was under siege again today was south of Taftanaz, in Idlib province.The rebel fighters are now bringing unprecedented levels of firepower against installations like these. So why does it appear that rebel progress has slowed to a crawl?
The first reason is the false expectations of the media. In previous wars, professional armies have often taken a year to advance several hundred kilometers. The rebel advance has been sudden, especially when one considers the amount of firepower Assad is still dropping from the air. The second reason, however, is that the rebels are not choosing to press the attack against locations they know will eventually fall. If the rebels can surround a base and shell it for weeks with little to no counterattack by the regime, where is their motivation to risk defeat by attacking at a faster pace? History tells us that the rebel forces have advanced in fits and spurts, wearing down Assad's defenses before overrunning positions. This is not a sign of weakness, but rather a sign of military discipline, and as Assad has not launched effective counteroffensives in Idlib, Aleppo, or Deir Ez Zor, it is unlikely that what appears to be a pause will result in any shift in momentum. There is no pause in the fighting, only in the headlines.
However, there is another reason for the slower rebel advance. Rebel forces have had to take their time to conserve ammunition and not risk losing heavy equipment. Each base contains many supplies that help fuel the rebel advance, but rebel leaders have always been cautious to ensure that they do what they can to conserve. Free Syrian Army commander Salim Idris told Al Jazeera in a recent interview that military support could be used to increase the pace of the rebel advances:
The main reason behind our slow progress and the stalemate on the front line is the lack of ammunition. We badly need tactical weapons. We are dealing with a regime that bombs civilians and villages using warplanes, TNT barrels and medium-range Scud missiles.
The reality is that Idris is likely somewhat exaggerating to some extent in order to win international military support, a long standing request of the FSA. However, the reality is that the rebels cannot afford to waste resources or men by taking the fight directly to the regime.
The tactic of whittling away at Assad's defenses has been effective, if slow, but when these two airbases do fall to the rebels, this will free up a significant amount of rebel resources which can then be put into the fight in other areas. ,,This is not a sign of weakness, but rather a sign of military discipline,,- Ovi sa Al-dzazire izgleda ili na dspiju ili na lsd-ju 
|
