|
Pretpostavljam da je to dovoljno za APC vozila , i naravno utvrdjene pozicije.
evo radi uporedjenja D 10 t top (SU 100 , T 55 Moderna municija ukljucujuci rakete):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D-10_tank_gun
In 1983, the T-55M and T-55AM tank upgrade program also added the ability to some tanks to fire the 9K116-1 Bastion guided missile system (NATO reporting name AT-10 Stabber), for long-range engagements of tanks and low-flying helicopters. The anti-tank missile is encased in the 3UBK10-1 shell, which is handled, loaded, and fired exactly like a conventional tank gun round. 1.5 seconds after firing, a laser guidance window in the tail of the round is uncovered, and its rocket engine ignites to burn for up to six seconds, with a total missile flight time of up to 41 seconds. The missile is very expensive, about half the price of a T-55M tank, but allows the venerable 100 mm gun to engage modern main battle tanks.
Missile ammunition includes:
3UBK10-1 (9M117 Bastion), penetrating 600 mm at up to 4,000 m
3UBK10M-1 (9M117M Kan) tandem warhead, penetrating 650 mm at up to 4,000 m
3UBK23-1 (9M117M1 Arkan) extended-range tandem warhead, penetrating 750 mm at up to 6,000 m
3UBK23M-1 (9M117M2 Boltok) extended-range warhead penetrating 850 mm at up to 6,000 m
i stara koristena do 1960:
D-10S 100 mm ammunition (Zaloga & Grandsen 1984:225) Round BR-412 APHE F-412 HE
Weight (kg) 15.6 15.8
Muzzle velocity (m/s) 895 900
Penetration at 500 m (mm) 160 –
Penetration at 1,000 m (mm) 150 –
Evo i za m 48 b1 , jedino sto sam nasao
Ammunition is of the semi-fixed type with four charges. It is based on that used for the obsolete Russian 76 mm Regimental Gun M1927 which fired fixed ammunition HE-unitary, HE-Frag, HESH, HEAT, Smoke, Inert training:
HE M55 projectile weighing 6.2 kg with a muzzle velocity between 222 and 398 m/s;
High-Explosive Anti-Tank (HEAT) projectile weighing 5.1 kg which will penetrate 100 mm of conventional steel armour at a range of 450 m; and * Smoke shell WP M60 weighing 6.2 kg.
Stavio sam ovo samo radi uporedjivanja, recimo po meni koncept vozila kao Panhard je jos uvjek aktuelan i upotrebljiv. Mala potrosnja, solidan top . Pogotova ta nasa Titova haubica 76 mm, da li je mogla naci mjesto na na nekom BOV-u ? Dao bi joj prednost zbog kratke cjevi, (mogla bi se lakse okrenuti u gustom rastinju, medju zgradama, korisniji u brdima) kao i dobra elevacija . E, sad problem trzaja, da li moze reducirati da to BOV podnese?
Takvo vozilo bi moglo da ima na sebi vodjeni projektil za jace ciljeve .
U prilog takvom orudju isla bi i cjena granate .
Naravno vjerojatno B1 vise nije upotrebljiv ( problem municije zastarjelosti kao i samoog postojanja stare municije i oruzja) , u nekoj novoj proizvodnji, korisnji bi bio minobacac-haubica , ali eto malo da bacim na razmisljanje ljude.
evo jos nekih primjera:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M1128_Mobile_Gun_System
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VBC-90
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2S9_Nona
http://tanknutdave.com/the-chinese-pll05-self-propelled-mortar-howitzer-system/
|
