Poslao: 27 Jul 2010 14:15
|
offline
- salesam
- Elitni građanin
- Pridružio: 03 Sep 2009
- Poruke: 1726
- Gde živiš: Zemun
|
Moguce, stvarno ne znam, a nevolim da procenjujem stelth na osnovu oka samo, posebo ne kod jako slicnih aviona. Meni promene izgledaju na bolje u aspektima koje sam delom naveo. Za stelth ostaje da vidimo.
Ono sto sam gotovo siguran je da su malo vise paznje posvetili pokretljivosti F-35, taj avion bi bio verovatno cudo s obzirom sta je sve doneo u tehnoloskom pogledu. Ovako i dalje sumnjam da ce biti top aparat ali ko zna videcemo.
Nego nesto drugo nikako da pitam, svi ste videli fantomski F-19 (maketu). Citao sam da je to najidealniji stelth oblik koji su pronasli ali da su imali problem radi neceg. Ja sam do tad mislio da je najidealniji oblik steltha letece krilo. Jel neko cuo/procitao nesto o ovome?
|
|
|
Registruj se da bi učestvovao u diskusiji. Registrovanim korisnicima se NE prikazuju reklame unutar poruka.
|
|
|
Poslao: 28 Jul 2010 16:28
|
offline
- Yellow Pinky
- Super građanin
- Pridružio: 21 Mar 2005
- Poruke: 1192
- Gde živiš: Niš
|
DJORDJE-NO-1 ::F-35 - take it or leave it
http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/opinion/f-35-take-it-or-leave-it-1.304297
"Who would have believed it? Some years ago Israel was developing the world's most advanced fighter aircraft, the Lavi, while the Western world's aircraft manufacturers were beating their way to our door, eager to participate in the Lavi project, or trying to sell their competing plane to the Israel Air Force. And now Israel goes hat in hand pleading for a chance to be allowed to acquire the F-35 aircraft, at a price tag of $150 million each. But it's not only the astronomical price. Israel is told that the F-35 must be taken as is - no changes or modifications to suit Israel's specific needs, and absolutely no Israeli systems included. Take it or leave it. "
Jao sto su dobri covece. Ispadose mucenici .
|
|
|
|
Poslao: 28 Jul 2010 16:31
|
offline
- jazbar
- Legendarni građanin
- Pridružio: 28 Dec 2009
- Poruke: 16139
- Gde živiš: Lublana
|
Onu cenu od 150 milijuna $ za komad F-35 mogu odmah da prepolove, jer će razlika da im stigne u obliku donacije Amerike.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poslao: 01 Avg 2010 11:01
|
offline
- zixo
- Legendarni građanin
- Pridružio: 27 Sep 2006
- Poruke: 23387
- Gde živiš: Beograd
|
Slazem se. Kanadi je bolje za lovacka dejstva da kupe Super Hornet ili mozda cak i F-22.
|
|
|
|
Poslao: 01 Avg 2010 11:06
|
offline
- Toni
- SuperModerator
- Pridružio: 18 Jun 2008
- Poruke: 31335
|
Ma za njih je F-18 SH puna kapa.
Plus ova jos poboljsana verzija za moguce kupce
|
|
|
|
Poslao: 01 Avg 2010 14:18
|
offline
- black venom
- Zaslužni građanin
- Pridružio: 30 Apr 2010
- Poruke: 552
- Gde živiš: Beograd
|
Naleteh na zanimljiv komentar - pogledajte
Citat: By
Stephen Trimble
on July 27, 2010 2:12 PM | Permalink | Comments (30) | TrackBacks (0) |ShareThis
I spent a week touring Israel's aerospace industry last November, which included a sighting of the only known survivor of the Lavi program. One of many things I came away with is a sense that Israel wants to return to the ranks of the world's developers of manned combat aircraft, rather than a niche supplier of systems and UAVs.
Ex-Lavi program manager and minister of defense Moshe Arens writes in Haaretz today that Israel would be better off launching a joint development program with Russia and India to build a new fighter rather than spend $11 billion to buy 75 Lockheed Martin F-35s. See excerpt below:
Are there alternatives to swallowing our pride and shelling out $3 billion for 20 F-35s? (The original plan had been to acquire 75 aircraft, which would have brought the price above $11 billion, but that was too expensive. ) Before we make that commitment, a little intellectual effort should be invested in looking at other options.
Does Israel still have the technological capability to design a first-rate fighter aircraft? That needs to be examined in some depth. No doubt some of the capability that existed at the time of the Lavi project has been lost over the years, but as has been proved time and again, Israel has a world-class technological capability. Its success in unmanned aerial vehicles is only one of a number of examples.
If it turns out that the capability to design the IAF's next fighter aircraft does exist in Israel, where could we go from there? Not to the U.S. Congress in search of funding, because we would have to remind them that 27 years ago they were fools to invest $1 billion in the development of the Lavi that Israel decided it did not want. We would have to look for partners who are prepared to invest resources in such a project, who have the necessary technological capability, and who are not involved in the F-35 project.
Are there such candidates? In theory, yes. France, with a great aeronautical industry, chose not to participate in the F-35 project. India, with a considerable aeronautical capability and a meteorically growing economy, might be another candidate. And there is Russia. Perhaps none of them would be interested, and perhaps all of them would be. It's worth a try.
|
|
|
|