|
Poslao: 30 Jun 2011 00:49
|
offline
- ANTIBODY
- Ugledni građanin
- Pridružio: 06 Jun 2011
- Poruke: 421
|
Napisano: 29 Jun 2011 21:34
ive added the link at the above post regarding grifo s. and some additions to my second -last post
ive been given an answer to your question , i'm waiting for clearance from nabil at the moment to qoute him here
by nabil
''Here is your answer bro....
the 5-6 kw is the peak power my friend and this is not in use usually as the aircraft engine can only give a certain amount of power. APG-68v9 has a usual power of 500- 600 watts at best with current f-16 configuration, same as the KLJ-7 with current jf-17 configuration, both radars have a reserve power capacity but this does not mean they are always operated at peak power output, no radar can as per my info. Hence they both have similar ranges and working modes. At the moment, the maximum output power of KLJ-7 as per my info is somewhere around 4-5kw, similar to v9. There are reasons why Italian radar was rejected, first, it had no multi target tracking capability, a small nominal power output of just 400 watts as compared to 600 watt asked by PAF and incompatibility to fire its main weapon, the sd-10 which italians promised to rectify. They improved the radar repeatedly but it still suffered with anomalies and hence got rejected. ''
Dopuna: 29 Jun 2011 22:41
      
Dopuna: 30 Jun 2011 0:49
nabil
JFT radar has publicized detection range of 105 km against 5m2 target and Su-30 even if, has RCS of 10m2, will be detected at around 200-210 kms!! I bet BARS cannot detect a 3m2 target even at 150 kms and JFT is much less than 3m2 so MKI will have a hard time detecting the JFT at advertised range. Reality is, it will most likely be the other way around. yes the JFT will see the MKI first!
|
|
|
|
|
Registruj se da bi učestvovao u diskusiji. Registrovanim korisnicima se NE prikazuju reklame unutar poruka.
|
|
|
Poslao: 30 Jun 2011 03:49
|
offline
- VITEZFOREVER
- Super građanin
- Nikola Vukota
- Multimedija , creativity work- world of disajn
- Pridružio: 08 Sep 2010
- Poruke: 1060
- Gde živiš: ZEMUN - Gardoš - Forsaž - BB.
|
- Vision of dual seat JF-17 :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poslao: 30 Jun 2011 12:19
|
offline
- x9
- Super građanin
- Pridružio: 04 Dec 2008
- Poruke: 1172
- Gde živiš: Vienna
|
yes it´s the peak power.but you can not take a rafale as example becaus e he has pesa radar.
the peak power is something that pilot use only in some occasion.JF17 maybe need only 500w or 600w in normal conditions,but at the moment when the pilot need to lock on and to hold on lock target,he needs more power(in case that the opponent makes some countermeasures).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poslao: 01 Jul 2011 00:45
|
offline
- Leonardo
- Moderator u penziji
- Pridružio: 17 Maj 2007
- Poruke: 13919
|
ANTIBODY ::JFT radar has publicized detection range of 105 km against 5m2 target and Su-30 even if, has RCS of 10m2, will be detected at around 200-210 kms!! I bet BARS cannot detect a 3m2 target even at 150 kms and JFT is much less than 3m2 so MKI will have a hard time detecting the JFT at advertised range. Reality is, it will most likely be the other way around. yes the JFT will see the MKI first!
U realnim borbenim uslovima, ukoliko uvazimo konfiguraciju terena, US F-15 i F-16 bez podrske AWACS bili bi srecni da ga otkriju na 105km, a kamoli na 200km. Verujem da se ta cifra od 200km pojavila cisto teoretski. Ne treba zaboraviti mogucnosti za ometanje (jamming) koje poseduje Su-30.
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FcArnepkhv0
Naravno 105km je vise nego dovoljno za lansiranje BVRAAM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
