Poslao: 11 Dec 2008 11:27
|
offline
- Pridružio: 20 Maj 2007
- Poruke: 4398
|
leonard ::
Moja zamerka je jedino sto pilot ima ograniceno vidno polje.
Manje - više svi migovi imaju taj problem.
|
|
|
Registruj se da bi učestvovao u diskusiji. Registrovanim korisnicima se NE prikazuju reklame unutar poruka.
|
|
Poslao: 11 Dec 2008 11:28
|
offline
- Leonardo
- Moderator u penziji
- Pridružio: 17 Maj 2007
- Poruke: 13919
|
grbe ::leonard ::
Moja zamerka je jedino sto pilot ima ograniceno vidno polje.
Manje - više svi migovi imaju taj problem.
Svi migovi do Miga-29.
--------------------
I ranije verzije Miga-21. Kasnije kad su mu dodali onu grbu smanjeno je vidno polje.
Rekao bi kod Miga 29 nije tako kriticna grba za vidno polje pilota.
|
|
|
|
|
Poslao: 11 Dec 2008 13:30
|
offline
- janezek67
- Počasni građanin
- Pridružio: 27 Dec 2007
- Poruke: 783
|
Problem Miga 23 je bio u tome, da je bio vrlo složen za letenje i piloti ga nisu obožavali. I bio je teži i skuplji za održavanje od Mig 21, pa su ga u vazduhoplovstvima varšavskog ugovora prije izbacili nego Mig 21.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poslao: 13 Dec 2008 01:13
|
offline
- Taso
- Super građanin
- Pridružio: 28 Maj 2008
- Poruke: 1079
- Gde živiš: Terra Australis
|
Zandar ::http://backfiretu-22m.tripod.com/id11.html
Link koji opisuje gde i sta je Mig-23 obarao.
Koja je prednost verzije MLD u odnosu na ML?
MLD je agilniji i opremljen je modernijom avionikom.....moze da koristi R-73
Imas detalje na stranici koju si postirao:
Soviet MiG-23MLD Flogger-K
http://backfiretu-22m.tripod.com/id12.html
Vikipedija:
Citat: * MiG-23MLD.
The MiG-23MLD was the ultimate fighter variant of the MiG-23. The main focus of the upgrade was to improve maneuverability, especially during high angles of attack (AoA).
The pitot boom was equipped with vortex generators, and the wing's notched leading edge roots were 'saw-toothed' to act as vortex generators as well.
The flight-control system was modified to improve handling and safety in high-AoA maneuvers.
Significant improvements were made in avionics and survivability:
- the Sapfir-23MLA-II featured improved modes for look-down/shoot-down and close-in fighting.
- A new SPO-15L radar warning receiver was installed, along with chaff/flare dispensers.
- The new and very effective Vympel R-73 (NATO: AA-11 'Archer') short-range air-to-air missile was added to inventory.
No new-build 'MLD' aircraft were delivered to the VVS, as the more advanced MiG-29 was about to enter production. Instead, all Soviet 'MLD's were former 'ML/MLA' aircraft modified to 'MLD' standard. Some 560 aircraft were upgraded between 1982-85. As with earlier MiG-23 versions, two distinct export variants were offered. Unlike Soviet examples, these were new-build aircraft, though they lacked the aerodynamic refinements of Soviet 'MLD's; 16 examples were delivered to Bulgaria, and 50 to Syria. These were the last single-seat MiG-23 fighters made, and the last example rolled off the production line in December 1984.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikoyan-Gurevich_MiG-23#Flogger-K
|
|
|
|
|
Poslao: 05 Jan 2009 15:34
|
offline
- mean_machine
- Legendarni građanin
- Pridružio: 23 Dec 2006
- Poruke: 12575
|
Nema ni MiG-29 dobru preglednost (kada se uporedi sa ostalim avionima 4 generacije) ali je bolji od prethodnih dvadestica.
MiG-23 nije predvidjen za blisku borbu. Za to su sluzili 21-ce. Koje su isto imale uzasnu preglednost. Nije bas jasno sto su to tako radili?
MiG-15/17/19 taj problem nemaju.
|
|
|
|
Poslao: 05 Jan 2009 15:50
|
offline
- Leonardo
- Moderator u penziji
- Pridružio: 17 Maj 2007
- Poruke: 13919
|
Pa nemaju problema ni ranije verzije Migova 21. Sve do popjave grbe...
Mig 29 isto tako ima dobru preglednost i malo je umanjena kod 9.13.
Setimo se Spitfajera i Me-109. Potpuno ista prica kod Amerikanaca i Rusa.
|
|
|
|