Spitfire

10

Spitfire

offline
  • Pridružio: 21 Apr 2011
  • Poruke: 1464

Jedan od najskladnijh aviona drugog svetskog rata.



Registruj se da bi učestvovao u diskusiji. Registrovanim korisnicima se NE prikazuju reklame unutar poruka.
offline
  • Pridružio: 08 Sep 2005
  • Poruke: 5743

Napisano: 06 Jun 2012 12:25

sremac983 ::Хартман никада није био оборен од стране противничког авиона....везано за тај случај, као и неколико пута после тога, а што је била и његова тактика током целог рата. Све се сводило да се он обруши на свог непријатеља великом брзином, да са што краће дистанце (неких 50-70 метара) саспе рафал у противнички авион. А како је хартман говорио нису ни знали шта их је снашло. е управо због тог његовог начина напада десил осе апр пута да му једноставно деливи са протвиничког авиона погоде његов. тако је и тад било када је услед оштећења задобијених од парчета руског јака морао да искочи.

рекао сам да је само у једном дану оборио 4 комада и још 2 или три касније....

ето гледајући документарац о ФВ190, немци су успел ида са релативно једноставним решењем надоместе мању брзину у односу на спита амрк 9, убацивањем ВМ-50 мешавине која је хладила боље мотор, самим тим су добили неких 50-60 коња више, а уједно и потребну брзину...

мислим да је једина предност Бф била у пењању и у наоружању у односу на П-51, остало је било на страни мустанга...мада то је данас јако тешко проценити јер и једни и други хвале своје авионе мало превише....

све у свему прави противник спиту је би не Бф већ ФВ....били су изузетне битке ове две изузетне машине....


Hartman je bio nemački propagandni uspeh - jednostavno njegovi uspesi su prenaduvani, ubrajani su u obaranja i avioni uništeni na zemlji u prvim fazama napada na SSSR.

Dopuna: 06 Jun 2012 12:28

Top je bolji od mitražjeza iz sledećih razloga:

1. Evropski avioni nisu imali mitraljeze kalibra 12,7 mm sem Italijanskih.
2. Domet mitraljeza Savezničkih aviona, koji su bili kalibra .303 ili 7,5 mm je isto koliko i pešadijskih mitraljeza istog kalibra, srazmerno mali za pojam vazdušnih borbi.
3. Top 20 mm imao je daleko veći domet i veći učinak.
4. U vazdušnoj borbi je značajno biti van dometa neprijateljevog oružja a da ti možeš da njega gadjaš sa tvojim oružjem.


Tako je top 20 mm postao okosnica naoružanja a mitraljezi samo pomoćno.



offline
  • Toni  Male
  • SuperModerator
  • Pridružio: 18 Jun 2008
  • Poruke: 31438

dobri covek ::

Uz duzno postovanje, po cemu su dva mitraljeza i jedan top bolji od osam mitraljeza?



Za vreme bitke za Britaniju BF-109 su bili ili sa topom 20 mm i 2 x 7,9 mm ili 2 x 7,9 mm i 2 x 20 mm. Radjena su testiranja gde se videlo da top 20 mm sa samo par granata pravi strasne rupe/kida oplatu( koja kao predstavlja oplatu spita/harikena), dok mitraljezi 7,7 mm prave rupe kao da busis oplatu ekserom. Uopste ne prave velike rupe i ne kidaju tako da prave strasno malu stetu i prosto ne ostecuju nista, samo je avion izresetan po trupu ili repu/krilima.
Samo na prvim verzijama Spita/Harikena su stavili 8 x 7,7. Posle se odma islo na 4 x 20 mm kod Harikena i 2 x 20 mm + 4 x 7,7 mm kod Spita.

Tu naravno ima i prica o tome kada se pojavio BF-109 E da jedan top i 2 mitraljeza nisu dovoljna za prosecnog pilota, koji bi brzo stukao granate za onaj jedan top.
Za lovca je najbolja bila americka doktrina sa 6 x 50 cal( P-47 x 8. Najbolji odnos kalibra/kolicine municije. Ko je trebao da obara bombardere imao je topove, kao svi u Evropi naprimer. Ameri nisu imali te potrebe nikad. Posle njih odma FW.

offline
  • Pridružio: 23 Dec 2006
  • Poruke: 12609

dobri covek ::
Ato, da su pucali sa 50-80m rastojanja, nije li malo ... za zutu majicu?


Sta bi bilo malo?

Sovjetski As govori o otvaranju vatre sa malih daljina:
[Link mogu videti samo ulogovani korisnici]

offline
  • Pridružio: 21 Apr 2011
  • Poruke: 1464

Evo jedne prelepe slike eskadrile spitfajera.

offline
  • Pridružio: 31 Dec 2011
  • Poruke: 20308

Khaless ::Napisano: 06 Jun 2012 12:25
...1. Evropski avioni nisu imali mitraljeze kalibra 12,7 mm sem Italijanskih...


Ali su imali 13mm poput nemackih.\

Citat:
Tako je top 20 mm postao okosnica naoružanja a mitraljezi samo pomoćno.


da je 1 x 20mm bolje od 1 ili mozda cak 2 x 12.7mm - jeste.
Da je 1 x 20mm + 2 x 13mm bolje od 6/8x12.7mm - nije.

offline
  • Pridružio: 21 Apr 2011
  • Poruke: 1464

Evo ovde malo piše o naoružanju spiteva.

offline
  • Neimar i savremeni farmer.
  • Pridružio: 24 Nov 2010
  • Poruke: 11776
  • Gde živiš: U sremu voljenome...

Napisano: 06 Jun 2012 15:57

калес

рече да су му приписани уништени авиони у првим фазама напада на СССР GUZ - Glavom U Zid ...

Citat:Hrabak assigned me to 7/III/JG-52 under Major Hubertus von

Bonin, an old eagle from the Spanish Civil War and Battle of Britain. We

learned a lot from him also. My first mission was on 14 October 1942.


како је могуће да му припишу те авионе, кад је прву мисију имао...



његово прво обарање у новембру 1942

Citat:That was a day I will never forget, 5 November 1942, a Shturmovik IL-2,

which was the toughest aircraft to bring down because of the heavy armor

plate. You had to shoot out the oil cooler underneath, otherwise it would not

go down. That was also the day of my second forced landing since I had flown

into the debris of my kill. I learned two things that day; get in close and shoot

and break away immediately after scoring the kill. The next kill came in

February the following year. This was when Krupinski came to Taman and

was my new squadron leader.


прича када је и како био "оборен" и како заробљен...
Citat:The Russians were attacking in our area and Hrabak gave us our orders. This

was in August 1943, and our mission was to support the Stukas of Hans-Ulrich

Ruedel in a counterattack. Then things changed. The Red Air Force was

bombing German ground positions in support of their offensive, so my flight

of eight fighters located and attacked the enemy, about forty Laggs and Yaks

with another forty or so Shturmovik ground attack aircraft. I shot down two

when something hit my plane. I made a forced landing and was captured by

Soviet soldiers. I faked that I was injured as they approached the plane. The

believed me and took me to their HQ and their doctor examined me, and he

even believed me. They placed me back in the truck (which was German) on a

stretcher, and as Stukas made their attacks I rushed the one guard in the truck.

He went down and I left out the back. As soon as I did that I heard the truck

stop, so I had to keep moving. I found myself in a great field of very tall

sunflowers where I tried to hide as I ran, all the while the men chasing me

were firing wildly in my direction. I found a small village occupied by

Russians, and decided to return to the area I had just come from and wait for

nightfall. [It was during this time that Mertens took it upon himself to take off

and find Hartmann, armed with only a rifle and water, being concerned when

his friend had not returned]. I reached my secure area and took a nap, and later

I awoke and took off again headed west. I passed a patrol of Russians, about

ten I think, so I decided to follow them. Then the patrol disappeared over a

small hill, and then there was a firefight. I knew that that must be the German

lines, since the men of the patrol came flying back over on my side. I then

walked to the other side and was challenged by a German sentry who also

fired a bullet at me, which ripped open my trouser leg. I was pretty upset, but

this man was in complete fear. I was welcomed into their position, given an

interrogation and was asked to prepare for contact. Another group of Russians,

obviously drunk walked towards our trenches, and the leutnant gave the order

to fire when they came within about twenty meters. They were all destroyed. I

was later told that a group of Russians had entered their perimeter speaking

fluent German, claiming to be escaped POWs, and when they came in they

pulled out some Tommy guns and killed some men. This explained their

caution over accepting me on face value, as I had no identification on me.

Everything had been taken when I was captured.


како је процењивао колико је који пилот који га јури искусан...

Citat: I knew that if an enemy pilot started firing early, well outside the maximum

effective range of his guns then he was an easy kill. But, if a pilot closed in

and held his fire, and seemed to be watching the situation, then you knew that

an experienced pilot was on you. Also, I developed different tactics for various

conditions, such as always turning into the guns of an approaching enemy, or

rolling into a negative G dive forcing him to follow or break off, then rolling

out and sometimes reducing air speed to allow him to over commit. That was

when you took advantage of his failing


мало о мустангу

Citat:This was in the defense of Ploesti and Bucharest, and also over Hungary when

the bombers came in and they had heavy fighter escort. I was recalled to take

over the command I/JG-52, and this was 23 June 1944. B-17s were attacking

the railroad junction, and we were formed up. We did not see the Mustangs at

first and prepared to attack the bombers. Suddenly four of them flew across us

and below, so I gave the order to attack the fighters. I closed in on one and

fired, his fighter coming apart and some pieces hit my wings, and I

immediately found myself behind another and I fired, and he flipped in. My

second flight shot down the other two fighters. But then we saw others and

again attacked. I shot down another and saw that the leader still had his drop

tanks, which limited his ability to turn. I was very relieved that this pilot was

able to successfully bail out. I was out of ammunition after the fight. But this

success was not to be repeated, because the Americans learned and they were

not to be ambushed again. They protected the bombers very well, and we were

never able to get close enough to do any damage. I did have the opportunity to

engage the Mustangs again when a flight was being pursued from the rear and

I tried to warn them on the radio, but they could not hear. I dived down and

closed on a P-51 that was shooting up an 109, and I blew him up. I half rolled

and recovered to fire on another of the three remaining enemy planes and

flamed him as well. As soon as that happened I was warned that I had several

on my tail so I headed for the deck, a swarm of eight Americans behind me.

That is a very uncomfortable feeling I can tell you! I made jerking turns left

and right as they fired, but they fired from too far away to be effective. I

was headed for the base so the defensive guns would help me, but I ran out of

fuel and had to bail out. I was certain that this one pilot was lining me up for a

strafe, but he banked away and looked at me, waving. I landed four miles from

the base; I almost made it. That day we lost half our aircraft; we were too

outnumbered and many of the young pilots were inexperienced.


и мало о скептицима који нису веровали колико је стварно уништио авиона, све сами немци...
Citat:Well, this happened to a few of us. Goering could not believe the staggering

kills being recorded from 1941 on. I even had a man in my unit, someone you

also know, Fritz Oblesser, who questioned my kills. I asked Rall to have him

transferred from the 8th Squadron to be my wingman for a while. Oblesser

became a believer and signed off on some kills as a witness, and we became

friends after that.



има тога још о Хартману, али и ово је превише јер није тема о њему већ спиту....

Dopuna: 06 Jun 2012 16:22

фиребар

ја сам говорио о хартмановом Бф-190Г6, на ком је он летео 1944 године, не на Г10 верзији...

FW-190 A4 није имао MW-50, тек је на верзији А5 тестиран, а на А6 почео да се овај систем масовно примењује, ако и на свим каснијим верзијама и FW i Bf.....

NO2 jе грешка, тачно је N2O и није коришћен у опште масовно већ само у авионима за извиђање.....

немци развијају FW-190D, са јумо мотором који је имао и снаге и брзине да парира савезничким авионима....

offline
  • Pridružio: 23 Nov 2010
  • Poruke: 103019

offline
  • Pridružio: 21 Apr 2011
  • Poruke: 1464

Priprema za farbanje Spitfire Mk,IX za naš avio muzel-Surčin daleke 1980 godine.

Ko je trenutno na forumu
 

Ukupno su 1031 korisnika na forumu :: 71 registrovanih, 5 sakrivenih i 955 gosta   ::   [ Administrator ] [ Supermoderator ] [ Moderator ] :: Detaljnije

Najviše korisnika na forumu ikad bilo je 3195 - dana 09 Nov 2023 14:47

Korisnici koji su trenutno na forumu:
Korisnici trenutno na forumu: 9k38, alexbr, amonsrb, arsa, blatruc82, bojan581, Boris90, Bozjidar87, ccoogg123, cvrle312, DalmatinacMF, Dare, darkdruid72, darkkran, Darko Jovanovic, Demi87, drimer, dukajov, esx66, Folkstar, gale48, GandorCC, Gogi_avio, Gonga, Goran_, ILGromovnik, indja, jackreacher011011, Jakonjveliki, Jaz, KonstantinR, Langdorf, Litostroton, Magnum_956, Marko1238, MarkoD, markolopin, Mercury, Mig 29, MiG-29M2, mrav pesadinac, Mskok, nevjerna beba, Panter, Parker, Podljub, Posmatrac77OKB, PrincipL, procesor, Pururin, Ranutovac, S-lash, sale76, samo opusteno, Sančo, sap, ser.hill, shaja1, sixpac, srpskasparta, Stanlio, stokssone, Str2022, synergia, The Boss, troki1971, vlada035, Vlado82, zivojin32, zombicar153, Zorge