Poslao: 19 Jun 2015 12:18
|
offline
- aramis s
- SuperModerator
- Pridružio: 18 Jul 2007
- Poruke: 28762
- Gde živiš: iznad smoga Beograda
|
Mare niko se ne ljuti, ali ti ne pročita dobro ono što sam napisao u prvom postu- idealan za STS, laki medicinski transport i prevoz specijalnih timova. Te stvari kod nas još uvek radi vojska, pa i helikopter treba da bude po vojnim standardima. Helikopter je pravljen za potrebe vojske koje su malo drugačije od civilnih. Misliš da se na Lakoti nije ništa radilo? Problem ubacivanja nosila se rešava i većim klizećim bočnim vratima, koja su uzgred potrebna i zbog vitla za izvlačenje pojasem, sedištem ili korpom-nosilima. Kod ovakvog otklona nema problema. Ne mora da bude čak ni ovoliki.
|
|
|
Registruj se da bi učestvovao u diskusiji. Registrovanim korisnicima se NE prikazuju reklame unutar poruka.
|
|
|
Poslao: 13 Sep 2015 18:15
|
offline
- Cigi
- Legendarni građanin
- Pridružio: 05 Jan 2011
- Poruke: 2879
- Gde živiš: Novo mesto
|
Russian Helicopters plans changes to Ansat light twin
https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/russian.....wi-416270/
Citat:Possible changes include an increase in the take-off weight from its present 3.6t maximum, larger 750kg (1,650lb)-capacity fuel tanks, with an additional 200kg reserve to boost range from the current 280nm (515km), changes to the pilot and passenger doors, and improvements to the passenger cabin such as better noise attenuation, enhanced ventilation and, in a proposed VIP interior, the addition of a toilet.
Initially developed with fly-by-wire (FBW) controls, these were later dropped from the civil variant of the Ansat in favour of a regular hydro-mechanical system because of uncertainty over the regulations covering civil certification of FBW-equipped rotorcraft.
Idu nazad na hidrauliku za civilnu certifikaciju.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|