Sikorsky UH-60 Black Hawk

• 0Niko još nije pohvalio poruku.
  Registruj se da bi pohvalio/la poruku!

Vijetnamci zainteresovani za MH-60R Seahawk
Citat:According to military experts, Vietnam is likely to order the MH-60R Seahawk Navy multi-purpose helicopters due to the urgent need.
http://defense-studies.blogspot.com/2018/05/vietna.....opter.html

• 0Niko još nije pohvalio poruku.
  Registruj se da bi pohvalio/la poruku!

Tajvanci hoce MH-60R Seahawks
Citat:The navy is eyeing Sikorsky MH-60R Seahawks to replace Hughes MD-500 Defenders as the anti-submarine warfare helicopter carried by its next generation of guided-missile frigates, a Ministry of National Defense source said on Monday.
http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2018/06/02/2003694176

• 3Ovo se svidja korisnicima: Cvijo_ue, shmele, MB120mm
  
  Registruj se da bi pohvalio/la poruku!

Ruski helici bolji
Pentagon’s New Helicopter for Afghans Lacks Lift of Old Russian Ones
Citat:The U.S. Army’s Black Hawk helicopters are less capable for some missions conducted by Afghanistan’s Air Force than the Russian-made ones they’re replacing, according to the Pentagon’s inspector general.

It’s a setback six years after lawmakers started pushing for the U.S. to stop buying the Mi-17 sold by Rosoboronexport, Russia’s state-owned weapons exporter, in light of President Vladimir Putin’s interventions abroad. The Afghan military, which is working to develop its Air Force’s capabilities, has been flying the Russian-made chopper since the 1980s.

The transition to Black Hawks made by Lockheed Martin Corp.’s Sikorsky Aircraft unit “presents several challenges that have yet to be fully addressed,” Pentagon Inspector General Glenn Fine wrote in his latest quarterly assessment of U.S. expenditures in Afghanistan, posted in May, the same month the first Black Hawk was flown in an Afghanistan operation by the nascent air force.

“Black Hawks do not have the lift capability” of the Russian aircraft, Fine wrote. The helicopters also “are unable to accommodate some of the larger cargo items the Mi-17 can carry, and in general it takes almost two Black Hawks to carry the load of a single Mi-17,” Fine said. “Unlike the Mi-17, Black Hawks cannot fly at high elevations and, as such, cannot operate in remote regions of Afghanistan where Mi-17s operate.”
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-06-14.....ssian-ones

• 0Niko još nije pohvalio poruku.
  Registruj se da bi pohvalio/la poruku!

De su sad Gos Aleksandar R i ostali da prokomentarisu....Moze biti samo jedan😀 MI 17...

• 0Niko još nije pohvalio poruku.
  Registruj se da bi pohvalio/la poruku!

Nisu BH lošiji nego imaju manju nosivost. Normalno kad nisu iste klase.

• 0Niko još nije pohvalio poruku.
  Registruj se da bi pohvalio/la poruku!

Gledao sam u KZB i u Nišu BH rekao bih da je mnogo brži i pokretljiviji od MI-17, zimus sam se iznenadio kako su leteli,ali veliki helikopter,a malo ljudi prevozi,bolje kupiti EC-145m

• 0Niko još nije pohvalio poruku.
  Registruj se da bi pohvalio/la poruku!

Kao sto rekoh na temi o Mi17 za BH, cist americki kretenizam i megalomanizam!

• 0Niko još nije pohvalio poruku.
  Registruj se da bi pohvalio/la poruku!

Pa ako im je problem kolicina transporta neka im daju Chinook-e. UH 60 je srednji visenamjenski takticki helikopter kao uslov vazdusne mobilnosti trupa shodno doktrini,a ne transportni kao Mi 8/17.

• 0Niko još nije pohvalio poruku.
  Registruj se da bi pohvalio/la poruku!

Cjena nabavke , cjena koristenja .
Ulozeno vs dobijeno

• 0Niko još nije pohvalio poruku.
  Registruj se da bi pohvalio/la poruku!

AKo je to, cijena nabavke izmedju Mi18 i UH 60 L (a mislim da su afganistancima dali verzije A) nije nista skuplji cak mozda i jeftiniji ako uzmem cijenu prodatih Mi17 Srbiji...nekih 12 miliona eura.
A drugo, treba imati na umu da Amerikanci koriste Black Hawk-e u avganistanu vec preko deset godina...tako da mi ova prica u najmanju ruku cudna. Mozda hoce da im se da verzija L koja ima jace motore...