|
Poslao: 16 Apr 2024 21:43
|
offline
- zoran MKD
- Legendarni građanin
- Pridružio: 21 Jan 2010
- Poruke: 3394
- Gde živiš: Makedonija
|
Napisano: 14 Apr 2024 18:52
Според Фјодоров
ИРСТ Халалио пресудио х -35
Citat:🇷🇺🇺🇦 "Оперативно-тактической авиацией, ракетными войсками и артиллерией группировок войск Вооруженных Сил Российской Федерации уничтожена пусковая установка зенитного ракетного комплекса «IRIS-T» производства ФРГ... ", - сообщило Минобороны России и опубликовало соответствующее видео.
На нем видно одну пусковую установку и многофункциональную РЛС TRML-4D ЗРК Iris-T. Стоят неподвижно, с маскировочными сетями. Для уничтожения применялись видимо также Х-35, так как видны две белые ракеты, обведены красным на скринах.
РЛС в результате сгорела, пусковая могла получить незначительные повреждения, потому что ракета ушла за дом.
На данный момент идут споры, являются ли это макетами. Хотя один из вражеских osint ресурсов признал, что не макеты.
Подписаться на канал (https://t.me/warhistoryalconafter)
Dopuna: 16 Apr 2024 21:43
и још јдеан Халалио или макета
https://twitter.com/i/status/1780252680310399335
|
|
|
|
|
Registruj se da bi učestvovao u diskusiji. Registrovanim korisnicima se NE prikazuju reklame unutar poruka.
|
|
|
Poslao: 16 Apr 2024 23:33
|
offline
- Pridružio: 31 Dec 2011
- Poruke: 19811
|
Nema sekundarne eksplozije od raketa, veoma moguce da je maketa.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poslao: 17 Apr 2024 13:20
|
offline
- Pridružio: 04 Sep 2022
- Poruke: 177
|
Не мора то да значи, није се распао како обично буде са макетом. Ово је вероватније погодак у прави систем.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poslao: 17 Apr 2024 15:04
|
offline
- Pridružio: 31 Dec 2011
- Poruke: 19811
|
Ako je potrosio rakete zasto i dalje stoji na vatrenom polozaju? A na polozaju nema nikakvih tragova da je dejstvovao...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poslao: 02 Maj 2024 21:16
|
offline
- amstel
- Legendarni građanin
- Pridružio: 13 Maj 2012
- Poruke: 2561
- Gde živiš: Hiljadu milja od topolivnice
|
Јел ово нека антена у средини слике?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poslao: 05 Maj 2024 10:54
|
offline
- Toni
- SuperModerator
- Pridružio: 18 Jun 2008
- Poruke: 30944
|
Treba vise raketa.
Citat:
My assumption that a lack of missiles (IRIS-T SL) is the limiting factor in the deliveries of IRIS-T SLM air defence systems to #Ukraine seems to be confirmed.
Members of the Bundestag (members of the Budget Committee) Andreas Schwarz, Sebastian Schäfer and Karsten Klein were in Ukraine (not for the first time) and shared their impressions with SPIEGEL.
During a visit to an IRIS-T SLM launcher, they noticed that it was equipped with only one missile instead of the maximum capacity of eight. According to the Ukrainian soldiers, the system delivered by Germany is extremely efficient, but they can hardly use it anymore because they lack the missiles.
To clarify: According to Diehl Defence, they produce up to 500 missiles per year (it is unclear whether only IRIS-T SL or also IRIS-T). Of course, not only do missiles have to be produced for new systems, but existing batteries in Ukraine also have to be regularly equipped with new missiles.
The requirements naturally grow with every system supplied to Ukraine, and it makes not a lot of sense to supply plenty of new systems to Ukraine when you can't even maintain the existing systems.
Only on Monday did the German government publicise the delivery of an unknown number of IRIS-T SL missiles to Ukraine to supply the systems already delivered. Another IRIS-T SLM system was also to be delivered to Ukraine at the end of April (delivery not yet confirmed).
https://twitter.com/deaidua/status/1787052350558908733
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poslao: 05 Maj 2024 11:25
|
online
- Kubovac
- Stručni saradnik foruma
- Pridružio: 12 Jul 2016
- Poruke: 5501
|
Toni ::
During a visit to an IRIS-T SLM launcher, they noticed that it was equipped with only one missile instead of the maximum capacity of eight. According to the Ukrainian soldiers, the system delivered by Germany is extremely efficient, but they can hardly use it anymore because they lack the missiles.
Eto nam i potencijalnog objašnjenja zašto ponekad ne vidimo sekundarne eksplozije na pogođenom lanseru. Podvlačim: "potencijalno objašnjenje".
|
|
|
|
|
|
